Roulette contra Lotto 6 / 49

(SYSTEM MARKET NEWS extra 2 / 1997)


One of the most obvious weaknesses of the Lotto game is the fact that generally only half the game proceeds will be distributed as profit!

What a difference the other hand, Roulette, where the Bank% of all sales are satisfied with 2.7, so 97.3% of all transacted bets go to the dividend (for players on even chances are even 98.65%). What else would have high chances of winning gambling to offer a way? Although the roulette game - compared to most other countries - here is a popular means (we have nearly 40 state-licensed casinos in Germany [cited 1997]), many times, the lottery is a popular than this "elitist" Casino game. Obviously it will take care the least that the chances of winning the lottery are much lower than in roulette. For this judge to be able to, it requires a certain mathematical education, few have known.

According to a calculation of the Federal Statistical Office, it is four times more likely to be killed by the lightning, the lottery than to have 6 correct. It is even 2600mal more likely to suffer the road-as to land the jackpot. 60.6% of our population still play occasionally or regularly Lotto, but only 4.7% occasionally or more oftenroulette. So widespread within the population of the suspicion, even at roulettecould be manipulated (40%), so it surprised the other, but that 55% of respondents not exclude at least that one can develop systems that help you in roulette with security could win.

But what are the odds of the roulette objective?
Mathematicians have only one answer: "The longer one plays, the more certain he will use every 2.7% of it lose. But who knows, that one-Lotto on long term with 48.34% loss of its operations must anticipate Saturday's?
So we ask whether and how high profits in roulette, at least theoretically possible - are. The maximum limits on a 5-Mark-table amount respectively to an amount of profit the bank in case of a payoff of max. 7000 marks forces. Consequently, the maximum is 200 and here for a number of simple chances (EC) 7000 Mark. For the 10-table subject to the double sums.

With 5 Mark can Plein than the 35-fold gain. EC only to the simple. Or? If you think just comes to the possibility of "Paroligewinne make", ie mainly with the money of the bank "playing. But for that it must come to EC to longer series. After all pieces is a 5-Series to RED with Paroli net effect is already 31 plus. But how often does a series of 5 are to RED? In my lexicon is on page 563 under "sociable" more accurate information: average every 71.5 coups once. If one payment to each hit a piece of it, then brings the series even gross 62 songs, while we only need to use pieces 71.5 average.

But what if we take on huge long series unpredictable? A 12 series comes on predetermined EC 11 000 Coups, although only every once before, so in diameter once per table per month. But they could already meet tomorrow. What's going get?

Although we already after 10 to the maximum responses come to stay over 4428 pieces! Unless we impose the excess payment amounts then the other opportunities to Plein then, are almost 5500 pieces, DM to reach 27 500 or so on 10-table twice.to meet this series has a probability of W = 0.00091, or approximately equal to 4 winning Lotto. There, however, there are only 112.60 Intersection DM, because with over 4300 other players must share the profits.

The fact that so many people still play Lotto each week, so it can on the dubious advantage of low operational ceiling are only spread hope to achieve an extraordinarily high income, and the simplicity of the rules. The above-mentioned drawbacks of the lottery to the roulette not want to admit, most obviously - or they are simply displaced. V.Haller Kurt

---

Roulette & Lotto

Why all this comparison? This brings us to but no further step to think some system players.
Sure, the final such comparisons do not succeed in solving problems through. If it is indeed possible, but mathematical likelihood of a quad lotto lotto payment of the par-five-piece to get to the which is already a strong argument against all roulette skeptics. This argument should those lottery players can go through the head to which the crow bar (expensive full-time or VEW systems) to enforce the luck. They fight constantly against a 50% downside to strength.
Of course, should one small bets on lottery play. Otherwise, do you get around the Minimalchance, large lot to drag the whole. Once there, however, for higher stakes and systematic game with "broadened set way" goes, money is deteriorating, the risk / extremely . The friction loss, with increasing Width of columns is always more to watch the roulette has deteriorated dramatically the chances of relationship, the more expensive combinations are played.

Max Woitschach, mathematics professor and expert in the field of game theory, wrote (including the books "strategy of the game", "probability and random" and "Can random count of?"), Describes this effect as follows: "The greater the number of operations, the greater number is still the law of large advantage. In other words: the very system players with their massed missions can get a lot more than other players to feel that the lottery is on average only 50% of its operations as a profit again recovered.
With a growing number of missions so loses the lottery and the nature of gambling is becoming a predictable events on the basis of probability theory and the rules of the game. "(Quote from:" probability and chance ")